dimanche 21 mai 2017

A Look Into How Bail Bonds Grand Rapids Work

By Andrew Fisher


The judicial system in America has gone through various amendments to increase its efficiency in clearing trial cases. Before Peter McDonough came up with the ides of Bail Bonds Grand Rapids in the nineteenth century, a quarter of all alleged criminal suspects failed to show up for trials. However, those who were released through a bond, adhered to the hearing date.

There is a lot of ignorance about how bonds work. Before, digging into that, of importance is to know what bail bonds are. In simple terms, it is a binding document, or a promise signed by the accused suspect to physically appear in court in the next trial. A credit agency, financial establishment or an insurance provider may come into play, but there are specific terms to meet during an association with a third party.

In most cases, the court is the entity to sets the amount to be levied. It varies from case to case, depending on the extent to which the defendant is said to have committed against the plaintiff. It is the only way to be granted freedom as the involved parties awaits the ensuing hearing proceedings. However, during the booking procedures, the arresting police may draw up the money to be paid as bond.

Unfortunate enough, not all accused persons appearing before a judge have the financial capacity to cater for the amount set by the judge or magistrate. In such an event, the accused has the chance to visit a surety firm, bank or a credit organization for assistance with the amount. That is convenient, but not quite. Defendants usually give up their assets or valuables as collateral.

When one decides to consult a middleman, for instance a bondsman, they are usually asked to pay a commission. The sum is normally a percentage of the total amount set by the judge. A standard ten percent commission is attached to moneys exceeding one thousand dollars. If the alleged offender ultimately declines to show up, the company pays, and collects the security from the defendant.

During appeals, there are also bonds involved. These are also referred to as Supersedeas or Safety Net bonds, the sum paid to the higher court as a judgement is being awaited. When the losing counsel feels a pang of discontentment, the appellant provides a sum of cash as assurance of commitment to the judicial process. The judges may decide to set a new fee, abandoning the first one.

The appeals bond is not a matter of the lower courts at the state level alone. The practice is also seen at the federal level. The plaintiff, while filing the appeal, provides details of the previous hearing and the aspects in which they feel were impartially determined. If applying for a bond, the decision should be made soon after judgement.

Violation of the bond contract has implications. Despite the fact that the surety company will have to bear the risks of losing the amount by the court, the rogue defendant becomes the center of adhesive scrutiny, because it will issue a warrant of arrest. Further, the assets or securities will be confiscated by the surety firm.




About the Author:



Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire